플로우티카 스크라이브

It is difficult to take notes and listen simultaneously during meetings or lectures, making it easy to miss important content. Existing smart pens or recorders existed, but there was the inconvenience of managing recording files and notes separately and having to manually organize them afterward. In addition, it took a lot of time to listen to the vast amount of recorded material and organize notes.

Flowtica Scribe has a built-in microphone and AI chip in the pen itself to automatically record audio from the moment you start writing. At the same time, it digitally captures pen movements and synchronizes handwriting on paper to the app in real time.

The key is the AI assistant function, which combines recorded content and handwritten content to generate automatic summaries or provides voice-handwriting search by keyword. In other words, even if the user only writes with a pen, the AI will finish organizing the meeting minutes later. Compared to competing products, it supports an all-in-one workflow (recording + writing + summarization) and cloud synchronization, allowing access from multiple devices.

The main customers are individual consumers (B2C) such as business professionals and students. It can also be sold as a productivity tool for corporate teams (B2B) with frequent meetings.

Global market entry is possible by expanding voice recognition models for each language. It has already gained attention from Kickstarter, etc., and is expected to expand widely into the education and corporate markets.

However, concerns about AI summary accuracy and personal information (voice recording) protection must be managed. In the future, we can target the creator market by supporting other forms of input (drawing, etc.) in addition to note-taking.

It received attention as a CES Eureka Park startup, and the natural handwriting-recording linkage was impressive in the actual demo. The professional media praised it as the emergence of an AI handwriting assistant, but in terms of product completeness, there is feedback that pen pressure and battery life need improvement.

Overall, the concept is clear and the utilization is high, so it is positive, but it remains to be seen whether differentiation will continue compared to competitors (e.g., Neo smartpen, etc.).